Speaking up for greener meetings

August 22nd, 2011

We have ideals.  We want “green meetings” but what does that even mean?

We want to serve food that is local, organic, and sustainable.

We want to meet in venues that compost, donate leftover food, serve sugar in bowls instead of packages.

We want to create signs that can be used over and over again and don’t end up in landfills.

We want sheets and towels that are grown from sustainable plants.

We want all of our supplies to be made from places that treat their employees right.

We want to work with suppliers that treat their employees right.

Bamboo Towels

And we have our ideals that we strive to achieve with each event.

But – it’s really hard to have a nutritious meal in Calgary in the winter from food that is local and organic.  We just can’t grow lettuce in the middle of winter.

Not all venues can donate food and many don’t have the ability to set up composting (although many can and do).

We use signs that meet our ideals, but create magnetic headers that we don’t recycle.  We need to find a solution to this – and we’re working on it.

We don’t generally insist on organic or sustainable sheets and towels.  Maybe we should start.

We often don’t know how employees are treated.

It’s time we took the time to do more research.  But we also need to accept some of our compromises along the way.  It’s hard to do the “perfect” meeting or event – but we need to keep trying.  As event planners – let’s keep trying, asking and insisting.  Let’s stop compromising on things we don’t need to compromise on.  Our industry has the same economic impact as the auto industry – if we speak up I’m sure we can make a difference.  We just need to keep doing it.

Equalize with U setups

May 12th, 2011

Months ago I said I spent a week in a U and never wanted to go back.  Click here to read what I wrote then.

But sometimes it’s easier to stick with the set-up that already exists.  Or we need to maximize the space so we compromise our ideals and put people in theatre style.  But what are we giving up when we do that?

I’ve been teaching Event Production at Mount Royal University this semester.  The very first class I got into the classroom early and found myself in a HUGE room and 17 registered for the class.  I think the room would easily hold 60 so we were potentially going to get lost in the room.  I proceeded to move all the desks around until I had a U.  It wasn’t a perfect shape but it was close enough.  The class went well and I liked the interaction.

7 weeks went by and each week I arrived in the classroom with only a few minutes to spare – so I didn’t change the set-up.  I’ve regretted it every week.

I watch the students in each row behave differently.  I’ve noticed that the back row is the most likely to sit on their laptops and not engage.  I know it looks like they are taking notes, but I know other activities are more likely.  The middle row is actually pretty interested, but may fall asleep (it’s an evening class so I try not to take it personally).  The front row is interested and awake.  I like it best when they choose the first row at the start of class and don’t just end up there because they came in late.

ANYWAY – I’m sure there are studies on the rows and what it means, or how to appeal to the different rows.  I could seek them out, but I’d rather go back to avoiding the rows altogether.

Last night I put a U back in place and it was like a different class. Granted, I did have a fabulous guest speaker, but the dynamics of the class changed.  The hierarchy of the rows went away.  The stuff I hate – the attitudes between the rows – went away.  The U equalizes everyone.

It’s worth the effort and the time to put the tables and chairs into the U.  I’ll even suggest that it’s worth the money to pay for the extra space.

I’m cheering for the U!

Is your event like a bottle of conditioner?

November 6th, 2010

I’ve been thinking a lot about education, schooling, learning and the differences between those 3 words and how it affects our children and our meetings and events.  We structure many conferences in the same way we went to school as kids.  We have someone lecture at the front of the room and when the speaker timer goes off – the learning is over.  Time for a break, or time for lunch, or time to go home.

In many instances we lack the time to reflect, to discuss and more specifically the time to learn from each other.

So how did I make the leap to a bottle of conditioner?

Well, this morning my conditioner was at the end of its bottle.  And I had to pry off the top and bang the remaining conditioner out onto my hand.

That’s why I think our systems are like conditioner – we give the majority of information freely and easily.  Like the first part of the bottle – it comes out with ease.  But the last bits – the bits that you’ve paid for and you want to get the use out of – those bits require effort.  You can just leave them in the bottle – but what are you wasting when you do that?

What are we leaving behind in the bottle when we don’t push to get that extra bit of information from our experts and from our colleagues?  How much information goes unsaid?  Or even worse, how much goes unlearned?

There are many people out in the world saying our education systems need a revolution – that how we are teaching our kids is not serving them well, and it won’t serve our society well in the future.  And there are many experts in the meetings and events industry saying our formats need a revolution.  We need to seriously look at how we learn and promote the very best efforts to do that – both in the classroom and in our event classrooms.

People come to conferences and meetings to learn – from each other, from experts – and we have a responsibility to make sure they do LEARN and not just LISTEN.  (And I do believe people also come to network and meet others – but we can’t ignore that we learn from each other so how can we turn those networking moments into teaching moments?)

I’m on the board of a preschool for children with Autism (Behaviour Therapy & Learning Centre in case you’re wondering which one it is).  Their strategy is to make every opportunity a teaching moment.  Could we adopt a similar philosophy at events?

What if we bang on the bottom of the conditioner bottle at our events?  What are we leaving behind that is valuable and should be used?

Is your event theme obvious?

July 30th, 2010

I was recently at Meeting Professional International‘s (MPI) World Education Congress.  The opening night reception was stunning.  Held outdoors beside the fabulous Vancouver Convention Centre, the Olympic flames were lit for us and the weather was gorgeous for an outdoor party.

I didn’t think was was a theme for the event – at least nothing was jumping out at me as a theme.  There was food that was representative of Vancouver – seafood, sushi, beef, oriental, etc.  The decor was colourful but didn’t stand out as anything obvious.  There were some clotheslines with clothes hanging on them though and I wondered what that was about – until I saw a girl doing aerial tricks on the clothes and then that became a cool piece of entertainment off on the sidelines.

The next day at lunch I overheard two planners discussing how their “garden” theme would be entirely different from the one done at the Opening Reception.

Which made me think “was the opening reception a garden party”?

It doesn’t really matter if it was or wasnt’ – the point of this blog is that it wasn’t obvious.  Why do we have “themes” if no one knows what it is?

We often have to come up with conference themes or event themes.  Sometimes it’s really easy – “Venetian”, “Old School Hollywood”, “Bollywood” all work really well for events.  It makes decor and food choices simple.  Conferences are much harder “Maximum Engagement” is harder to establish as a theme for instance.

I sometimes like to try not to have a conference theme if it is going to be something that no one knows about.  Most conferences like hanging their hat on a theme even if it becomes a simple tag line and that’s the extent of the theme.

Have you had experience in making your theme so obvious that it hits people over the head?  Or in stating your theme only to have no one understand the relevance?  Comment below!

Please only lecture for 20 minutes

July 23rd, 2010

Adults will only pay attention for 20 minutes before you need to do something else.  Speakers – are you listening?  20 minutes.

If you can cook an entire meal in 20 minutes -  you can get all your relevant points across in a lecture.

Really look at your content.  Are your points clear and concise?

Can you get your attendees to talk amongst themselves to talk through your main points?  Will the discussion further your learning objectives?

Even if you just CAN NOT cover everything in 20 minutes, STOP, Do something else and then start up again.

Allow people to ask questions.

Allow people to discuss in small or large groups.

Prepare an activity that reinforces what you were talking about.

Just please don’t keep talking for another 20 minutes.

We all have a responsibility to make meetings and events better.  As Calgary event planners we work with speakers on the finer elements of adult learning.  We stress to our speakers to only lecture for 20 minutes at the most without breaking it up with something else.

The “anything but lecture time” can be simple – it might just be a few questions from the audience.  It just has to be a moment when someone else is talking.  It needs to be a change of pace for the audience.  Let them re-group and you’ll find they pay attention to the next 20 minutes a lot better.

What are examples of things you do at the 20 minute moment?  Or do you even wait 20 minutes?